I still remember the bill: $3,000 in a single month. And for what? A collection of half‑working tools that I forced into existence. It started innocently – I built a “collaborative clone” of myself in ChatGPT, feeding it my business knowledge. Then I discovered Replit, and like Daniel said, it felt like crack. Like a slot machine in Vegas – pull the lever, hope for a win.

The problem? I didn’t know the right method. I kept screaming at Replit, trying to correct it, but it kept making things up. Yes, I built some useful stuff, but the cost – both financial and emotional – was insane. I was spending thousands on compute and countless hours debugging nonsense.

Looking back, I realise I was forcing AI to do something it wasn’t designed for. Replit is a great pattern‑matcher, but it doesn’t know the world. It doesn’t remember facts. It guesses. And when you’re building anything that matters – especially in finance – guessing is not good enough.

The lesson? Don’t treat AI like a magical brain. Treat it like a junior developer who needs constant supervision and a reliable source of truth. Without that, you’re just gambling. And the house always wins.

Related Posts

Reliable AI Beats Powerful AI Every Time
The End of Cold Calling for Retirement Advisors
Voice-First: The Silent Killer of Traditional Advisory Sales